Comparison of Circular Clarifier and Rectangular Clarifier

In any sedimentation-based wastewater treatment system, the choice between circular and rectangular clarifiers is critical. The clarifier’s geometry affects not only footprint and civil cost but also hydraulic flow, sludge handling, and long-term efficiency.

Both configurations have proven their worth in diverse applications, but modern treatment plants often face trade-offs in space, cost, and performance.

This article compares the pros and cons of circular clarifier design vs. rectangular clarifiers—particularly in the context of clarifiers for municipal sewage and industrial ETPs.


What Are Clarifiers in Wastewater Treatment?

Clarifiers are primary or secondary settling tanks that remove suspended solids from wastewater by gravity. The influent enters at a controlled velocity, allowing heavier particles to settle at the bottom, forming sludge. Clarifiers are designed for:

  • Consistent hydraulic flow distribution

  • Maximum solids removal

  • Minimal short-circuiting and turbulence


Overview of Circular Clarifier Design

Circular clarifiers consist of a round tank with a central feed well, radial flow pattern, and peripheral effluent weirs.

 Circular Clarifier Design – Core Features

  • Center-feed mechanism: Ensures symmetrical flow and better hydraulic balance

  • Radial flow pattern: Sludge settles and moves toward the center for removal

  • Rotating scraper arm: Collects sludge and directs it to a central hopper


Overview of Rectangular Clarifiers

Rectangular clarifiers are long, straight tanks with flow entering at one end and exiting at the other.

  • Simpler construction, ideal for linear plant layouts

  • Sludge moves longitudinally toward a collection trough

  • Mechanized chain-and-flight scrapers for sludge conveyance


Key Differences Between Circular and Rectangular Clarifiers

Parameter Circular Clarifier Design Rectangular Clarifier
Flow Pattern Radial Plug Flow (Linear)
Sludge Removal Central hopper via scraper arms End trough using chain scrapers
Hydraulic Performance Better distribution, low short-circuiting More prone to velocity gradients
Maintenance Complexity Moderate (rotating mechanism) Lower (simpler chains)
Footprint More compact, but wider Space-efficient in narrow layouts
Civil Construction More complex due to circular concrete ring Easier with standard rectangular tanks
Typical Use Municipal STPs, large industrial ETPs Smaller ETPs, limited footprint facilities

Advantages of Circular Clarifiers

  1. Hydraulic Symmetry

    • Uniform radial flow reduces dead zones

    • Enhanced settling efficiency

  2. Central Sludge Collection

    • Shorter sludge path

    • Reduces sludge aging

  3. Aesthetics & Accessibility

    • Easier to place in landscaped STP facilities

  4. Structural Stability

    • Better resistance to external soil pressure


Advantages of Rectangular Clarifiers

  1. Ease of Construction

    • Built with standard concrete shuttering

    • Faster construction, lower cost

  2. Modular Design

    • Can be installed in series or parallel

    • Easier to scale

  3. Maintenance Access

    • Simpler scraper system

    • Easy access along straight channels

  4. Footprint Efficiency

    • Ideal for long narrow plots, especially in industrial estates


Clarifier Design Considerations

When choosing between circular and rectangular clarifiers, engineers must consider:

Design Factor Circular Clarifier Rectangular Clarifier
Flow rate (m³/hr) >500 preferred Up to 500 common
Sludge type High solids – better circular Thin sludge – rectangular acceptable
Plant layout Radial flexibility Linear pipelines preferred
Retention Time 2–3 hours typical 2–3 hours
Surface Loading Rate (SLR) 1.2–1.6 m³/m²/hr 0.8–1.2 m³/m²/hr

Clarifier for Municipal Sewage – Which Is Better?

Most municipal sewage treatment plants opt for circular clarifiers due to:

  • Large influent variability

  • Higher sludge load

  • Need for better hydraulic balancing

In contrast, small towns or decentralized STPs often use rectangular clarifiers for cost savings and layout flexibility.


📌 H2: Clarifier for Municipal Sewage with High BOD Load

In plants where influent BOD is >300 mg/L and solids are non-uniform, circular clarifiers outperform rectangular ones due to better sedimentation uniformity.


Cost Comparison

Item Circular Clarifier (25 MLD) Rectangular Clarifier (25 MLD)
Civil Cost High (excavation + ring slab) Lower (rectangular base + walls)
Mechanical Cost Moderate (rotating arms, scrapers) Moderate (chain & flight system)
Installation Time 4–6 months 2–4 months
O&M Cost Slightly higher Lower

Global Examples

  • Singapore NEWater Plant – Uses high-capacity circular clarifiers for primary and secondary sedimentation

  • Los Angeles Hyperion STP – Mix of circular and rectangular clarifiers for redundancy and flow flexibility

  • Riyadh STP – Modular rectangular clarifiers to fit within limited desert land


What Do Clarifier Manufacturers Recommend?

Leading manufacturers such as:

  • WesTech Engineering

  • Ovivo Inc.

  • Xylem Water Technologies

…offer both designs, but recommend circular clarifiers for centralized STPs and rectangular clarifiers for decentralized and retrofit applications.


Conclusion

There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to clarifier geometry. The right choice between circular clarifier design and rectangular systems depends on flow rates, space availability, influent type, sludge characteristics, and budget.

For large municipal sewage treatment plants, circular clarifiers are generally preferred for better sedimentation performance. In contrast, rectangular clarifiers are suitable for smaller or modular installations where civil simplicity and linear layouts are priorities.

Before finalizing your design, always consult an experienced clarifier manufacturer who can analyze your influent characteristics and plant layout.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *